By Nate Raymond
BOSTON, June 30 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Tuesday blocked U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration from implementing a new rule stripping public service workers of eligibility for federal student loan forgiveness if it deems their employers to have a “substantial illegal purpose.”
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston sided with Democratic-led states, cities and nonprofits that argued the U.S. Department of Education’s rule would allow it to target groups supporting immigration rights, transgender healthcare and other causes the Trump administration disfavors by disqualifying them from the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF).
That program allows borrowers to have their federal student loans forgiven after 10 years working for government or nonprofit employers. More than 1 million borrowers have received debt relief since Congress established it in 2007.
Joun, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, said the Education Department lacked authority to disqualify employers, and consequently borrowers, and was relying on policy objectives that Congress never identified as relevant to establish eligibility for the program.
He said the rule also unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of viewpoint in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment by targeting nonprofit employers engaged in speech and activities that run counter to Trump’s agenda.
“Indeed, the record further demonstrates that the Final Rule has already chilled protected speech,” the judge wrote.
As a result, Joun struck down the rule ahead of it taking effect on Wednesday.
The Education Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump in a March 2025 executive order said the program has “misdirected tax dollars into activist organizations that not only fail to serve the public interest, but actually harm our national security and American values.”
His order directed the Education Department to revise regulations governing the program to redefine what constitutes “public service” work to exclude organizations that engage in activities that have a “substantial illegal purpose.”
The Education Department did so with a final rule that it published in October that defined “substantial illegal purpose” as covering activities that include aiding illegal immigration; supporting terrorism; engaging in illegal discrimination; and participating in the “chemical and surgical castration or mutilation of children.”
The plaintiffs sued in November in order to have the rule blocked from taking effect, saying it was clearly designed to target causes the administration disfavors.
Joun said the rule “does just that by threatening to revoke PSLF eligibility from borrowers who, among other things, lawfully assist immigrants; teach diversity, equity, and inclusion practices; and facilitate gender-affirming care.”
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Sanjeev Miglani)
Comments